“Taking this a step further, we think that an Internet media company (using just one example) can (and should) be structured not as AOL and Yahoo were or are, but instead as a loose collection of similarly related businesses (similar in philosophy of how you interact with users, how you build your service, how you view data, how you view inter-relating with other businesses), that work together - cross pollinate - in a number of different but flexible and fluid ways.
It implies a level of uniform ownership that I don’t think you actually mean.
No, I actually mean a completely non-uniform level of ownership in things.
Rafer sez:
@AWeissman I’m not sure that calling it a “media company” works here. It implies a level of uniform ownership that I don’t think you actually mean.
(via rafer)
